Visit and Subscribe to my YouTube Channel and watch my journey!
The search for a good piece of property continues. If you found this post and have no clue what I'm talking about you can read about why I want to live off the grid here.
I'm looking for that perfect piece of property is based on some criteria that I developed. Read more about the criteria I've chosen in Where to Live Off the Grid - Which States Are the Best?
Prior to this post, I've looked at minimum winter temperatures and have placed the states into three categories.
As I do more research the states are ranked from ideal to not a chance.
The ideal states are places where I'll look for a piece of land first.
My research found that Alaska, Idaho, and Missouri have limited areas based on my minimum winter temperature criteria.
Will Alaska, Idaho, and Missouri meet my other criteria for a place to build an off the grid homestead?
As much as I find high mountain lakes beautiful and 30-years ago I would've jumped at the chance to live in such a place, cold weather is no longer something I want to tolerate.
Freezing temperatures are one thing, but when it dips below 20-degrees for extended periods of time, that is where I draw the line.
Truthfully, I'm not sure what Missouri has to offer. According to my temperature research, Missouri is within temperature zones 6 & 7, which is ideal for me. I'm not sure what the state has to offer me with rainfall and topography so I didn't add the state to the top list. If future research shows Missouri has what I'm looking for I'll move it up the list.
Let's take a closer look at Missouri.
As previously mentioned, I know little about Missouri, only that the Mississippi River is nearby. Not even sure if it flows through the state or only along the border. But that is why we do research.
I've watched a few YouTube Homestead channels that live in Missouri and the terrain looks interesting in Ozark area.
Even though Missouri wasn't on my radar as a state to live in, the winter temperatures are ideal, at least in the southern part.
Let's take a look at the precipitation map.
A review of the map shown below shows that all but the northwestern portion of the state receives more than 36-inches of rainfall. The range I'm looking for is between 35- and 50-inches of precipitation and 90% of the state falls into that range.
Since Missouri is within my temperature and precipitation criteria, I'm going to change its status and add it to the ideal list.
As a geologist, I needed to take a field-based course to graduate. I chose to go to Idaho State University's 6-week field camp course based in the Snake River Plain and Sawtooth Mountain Range.
I know that state has a lot of what I'm looking for in a place to live, but I also know it is broken up into desert-like areas and high elevation areas with cold temperatures.
The question I have is, does Idaho have enough rainfall and vegetation with the temperate climate I'm looking for?
Let's take a look at the states average precipitation amounts and go from there.
As you can see a large portion of Idaho is much drier than I hoped. The portion of the state I visited, the central to the west-central area is much too dry. But the southern part of the neck or handle (not sure what Idahoans call it) receives between 40- and 50-inches. A perfect amount of precipitation.
I also know that Idaho is mountainous and might be too cold, so I'll need to compare a better minimum temperature map and compare it to the precipitation map.
After viewing the maps, there are a couple of counties that get enough rainfall and have zone 5 and 6 temperatures (similar to where I live now).
From reading other blogs and books, I've learned that Idaho has many other criteria on my list.
I'm not sure I want to live that far west, but for now, I'll add it to the Ideal list. What I like is the ideal area is relatively small and that will make the search for a piece of property much easier
Alaska is beautiful in my eyes. I wished I moved there many decades ago. But I didn't, and now everyone in my life lives pretty much on the eastern side of the country.
I'm not sure I want to move that far west. Of course, there is a chance my daughters may move away from the east coast, but I think that is a long shot.
Still, Alaska is where adventurers that want to live in the states go. Unfortunately, the climate is much too cold for me now, and only the southeastern portion of the state has warmer winter temperatures.
Below are maps showing the precipitation and minimum winter temperatures. You can click on the images to make them bigger.
As you can see, the Alaskan warmer areas receive a ton of rain, up to 280-inches!
Most areas in the warmer zones receive well over 100-inches. As wonderful as that is for plant growth, it won't do much for my mood.
I enjoy the sun and crave its energy.
Alaska is beautiful, but it will need to be moved to the Not a Chance list.
After reviewing annual precipitation that falls on Alaska, Idaho and Missouri, and taking a closer look at temperatures I'll add Missouri to the list of states that look ideal.
Idaho has a couple of counties that are warm enough and receive a good amount of rainfall, though, most of the state is too dry.
Alaska without a doubt has all the views and the type of land I'd love to build on, but the areas with moderate rainfall are too cold, and the warmer areas are too wet. For those reasons, Alaska will be moved to the list of states that don't meet my criteria.
If you live or previously lived in any of these three states, leave me a comment below telling me about your experience. I'd love to hear from you.
Please share this post with your friends on social media. If you have a Pinterest Board, you can pin the image below.
I don't like spam...not even in a sandwiches.